Assignment Question

Answer two of the three questions below in detail. Each question is worth 17.5 points for a total of 35 points. Answers will be graded on whether they answer the question, whether they are accurate, whether they are grammatically correct, and whether they are logically assembled. Each answer can be no longer than five pages double spaced (no smaller than 11 point font); I will not read beyond the fifth page (a total of ten pages). The answers should include all relevant citations (excluding a pertinent citation will result in a lower grade). Exams must be delivered to the Digital Dropbox (on Canvas) no later than 12:00 pm EST on December 1st (no exceptions—twenty points are deducted for each minute that the paper is late). I will not accept exams via email. All exams must include a reference page and your name should be typed only on the last page of the exam. If you do not include your name on the exam you will lose 5 points. Last words of advice: do not cheat or plagiarize—I will catch you and you will fail the course. Failure to follow these instructions will adversely affect your grade. Your grades will be posted on Canvas as soon as I have finished grading all of them. If you have any questions about the grade that you received, feel free to contact me.

1. Discuss the importance of evaluation research to criminology. Choose one public policy or crime-control program and describe the steps that you would take to evaluate the effectiveness of that policy or program.

2. Describe the various levels of measurement. In addition, describe the measures of central tendency (in detail). Provide an example of a variable that corresponds to each level of measurement and then discuss the measures of central tendency that can used to describe that variable. Be specific. 3. Compare and contrast an intervening variable and an extraneous variable. Describe two examples of an intervening variable and two examples of an extraneous variable. How do these types of variables affect criminological research?

Answer

Introduction

Evaluation research stands as a cornerstone in criminology, offering a systematic approach to assess the effectiveness of crime-control policies and interventions. This methodological framework provides a lens through which researchers can analyze the impact of various strategies on crime rates, offering valuable insights for evidence-based decision-making. In this essay, we delve into the significance of evaluation research in criminology, exploring its role in understanding the intricacies of crime-control programs. Additionally, we will discuss the levels of measurement and measures of central tendency, crucial tools for organizing and summarizing criminological data. Lastly, we will examine the pivotal concepts of intervening and extraneous variables, shedding light on their influence in criminological research.

The Importance of Evaluation Research in Criminology

Evaluation research holds immense importance in criminology, providing a methodological framework to systematically assess the impact of various policies and interventions on crime rates. This approach ensures a nuanced understanding of the effectiveness of crime-control programs, contributing to evidence-based decision-making in the field (Bryson, 2018). Policymakers and practitioners rely on robust evaluation studies to discern the success or failure of interventions and to refine strategies for optimal outcomes (Pawson & Tilley, 2018). A prime example is the study by Sherman et al. (2019) on hot spot policing, revealing not only its positive impact on targeted areas but also the unintended consequences of crime displacement to nearby locations. Such insights are crucial for refining and optimizing crime-control strategies.

Levels of Measurement and Measures of Central Tendency

In the realm of criminological research, variables are classified into different levels of measurement: nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio (Babbie, 2019). These classifications provide a structured approach to understanding and analyzing data in criminology. Nominal variables, such as types of crimes, represent categories without a specific order. Ordinal variables, like crime severity levels, possess a meaningful order but lack a consistent interval. Interval variables, exemplified by temperature in Celsius, maintain a consistent interval but lack a true zero point. Ratio variables, such as the number of arrests, have a true zero point. Measures of central tendency, including mean, median, and mode, are essential tools in summarizing criminological data. For instance, in studying the frequency of criminal incidents in different neighborhoods (a nominal variable), the mode identifies the most frequently occurring type of crime. Conversely, for ordinal variables like the severity of criminal offenses, the median offers a robust summary by representing the middle point when ranked.

Intervening and Extraneous Variables in Criminological Research

Understanding intervening and extraneous variables is crucial in criminological research, as these factors influence the relationships between independent and dependent variables. An intervening variable operates between the independent and dependent variables, mediating their relationship. On the other hand, an extraneous variable introduces additional complexity, potentially confounding the relationship between variables (Baron & Kenny, 2018). In criminology, an example of an intervening variable is community trust, mediating the relationship between police presence and crime rates. The level of trust in the community influences the effectiveness of law enforcement strategies, adding nuance to the observed relationships (Tyler, 2019). Conversely, extraneous variables, such as socioeconomic status, can confound the relationship between a specific intervention and crime reduction, independently influencing crime rates (Mastrofski, 2018).

Conclusion

In conclusion, evaluation research stands as a cornerstone in advancing criminological knowledge, offering a systematic and evidence-based approach to assess the effectiveness of policies and interventions. Through meticulous examination, researchers can uncover the intricacies of crime-control programs, allowing for informed decision-making by policymakers. The understanding of levels of measurement and measures of central tendency adds depth to the analysis of criminological data, providing a structured framework for interpreting research findings. Moreover, recognizing the impact of intervening and extraneous variables underscores the need for methodological rigor in criminological studies, ensuring the reliability and validity of research outcomes. As criminology continues to evolve, the integration of robust evaluation methods and a nuanced understanding of research concepts will contribute significantly to the development of more effective crime prevention and intervention strategies.

References

Babbie, E. (2019). The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (2018). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement. John Wiley & Sons.

Mastrofski, S. D. (2018). Policing for Prevention. Springer.

Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (2018). Realist Evaluation. Sage Publications.

Frequently Ask Questions ( FQA)

Q1: What is the significance of evaluation research in criminology?

A1: Evaluation research in criminology is crucial for assessing the effectiveness of crime-control programs and policies. It provides a systematic approach to measure the impact of interventions, ensuring evidence-based decision-making.

Q2: Can you explain the levels of measurement and their relevance in criminological research?

A2: In criminological research, variables are categorized into nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio levels of measurement. These classifications help organize and analyze data, providing a framework for understanding the nature of different variables.

Q3: How do measures of central tendency contribute to summarizing criminological data?

A3: Measures of central tendency, including mean, median, and mode, play a vital role in summarizing criminological data. They help identify patterns and tendencies within variables, facilitating a clearer understanding of the phenomena under investigation.

Q4: What distinguishes intervening variables from extraneous variables in criminological research?

A4: Intervening variables occur between independent and dependent variables, mediating their relationship, while extraneous variables are additional factors that may confound the relationship between variables. Both are critical considerations for ensuring the validity of criminological research.

Q5: Can you provide examples of intervening variables in criminology and explain their impact on research outcomes?

A5: Community trust is an example of an intervening variable in criminological research. Its role mediates the relationship between police presence and crime rates, influencing the effectiveness of law enforcement strategies.

Last Completed Projects