Readers in an academic setting will likely expect you to advance a scholarly conversation and not just reproduce someone else’s ideas. To validate your perspective, it will be essential to identify others who have argued the same points to take a stand with some ongoing scholarly conversation. In your peer responses, carefully identify the parts of the argument and position yourself based on the evidence.
Choose one of the two topics and write a paragraph that states and supports your position.
Is it a good idea to sample your DNA for genealogy?
Is climate change a real threat?
Include the critical parts of a good argument
Provide qualified supporting evidence.
In your peer response, identify the critical parts of the argument presented. Then present your position. Did the evidence influence your position? Why or why not?
Last Completed Projects
topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
---|
jQuery(document).ready(function($) { var currentPage = 1; // Initialize current page
function reloadLatestPosts() { // Perform AJAX request $.ajax({ url: lpr_ajax.ajax_url, type: 'post', data: { action: 'lpr_get_latest_posts', paged: currentPage // Send current page number to server }, success: function(response) { // Clear existing content of the container $('#lpr-posts-container').empty();
// Append new posts and fade in $('#lpr-posts-container').append(response).hide().fadeIn('slow');
// Increment current page for next pagination currentPage++; }, error: function(xhr, status, error) { console.error('AJAX request error:', error); } }); }
// Initially load latest posts reloadLatestPosts();
// Example of subsequent reloads setInterval(function() { reloadLatestPosts(); }, 7000); // Reload every 7 seconds });